Af S Nikkor 70 300mm 1 4.5 5.6 G Review Good Ideas
Af S Nikkor 70 300mm 1 4.5 5.6 G Review. Zoom ring very broad and rubberized, labeled 70, 100, 135, 200 and 300 mm. A decent performer in iq. At least not at 300/5,6 and the actual conditions. In some tests it was complained about yellow/blue ca's but the lens i could test did not produce ca's. If i moved the manual focus ring, the meter in the window only moved between closest up to 7,5ft, it was more or less the same when using af mounted on my d700 body. Non ed, i suspect they. I bought it used a couple of months ago, it seemed to be in very good condition. Review by klaus schroiff, published march 2007 lens kindly provided by erik heyer! Don't fret over the ed vs. The lens does suffer at 300mm though, with frighteningly poor performance which, unfortunately, blows all its good work at 70mm out of the window. It seems that the lens works very good at 200mm and even better at the lower. It's a pity, at open apertures the lens loses in sharpness to modern analogues, but photography is not rich in sharpness alone :). Trusted reviews is supported by its audience. For a couple of years the community looked with envy towards canon where even two good quality, slow speed tele zooms are. This makes it possible to design the lens with a smaller minimum length ( generally when it is zoomed out) compared to internal zoom lenses.
A decent performer in iq. It's built better, it's bigger, photodo.com says it's much sharper, and it's real nikon. Trusted reviews is supported by its audience. Zoom ring very broad and rubberized, labeled 70, 100, 135, 200 and 300 mm. The lens does suffer at 300mm though, with frighteningly poor performance which, unfortunately, blows all its good work at 70mm out of the window. Don't fret over the ed vs. Non ed, i suspect they. I bought it used a couple of months ago, it seemed to be in very good condition. 6 out of 10 points and not recommended by dugong5pm (52 reviews) cheap. Verdict performs best at the shorter end of the range, but deteriorates as you zoom Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. For a couple of years the community looked with envy towards canon where even two good quality, slow speed tele zooms are. If i moved the manual focus ring, the meter in the window only moved between closest up to 7,5ft, it was more or less the same when using af mounted on my d700 body. It seems that the lens works very good at 200mm and even better at the lower.
The entire body is made of plastic (including bayonet), which is why it turned out quite easy.
Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. I bought it used a couple of months ago, it seemed to be in very good condition. Zoom ring very broad and rubberized, labeled 70, 100, 135, 200 and 300 mm.
I bought it used a couple of months ago, it seemed to be in very good condition. If i moved the manual focus ring, the meter in the window only moved between closest up to 7,5ft, it was more or less the same when using af mounted on my d700 body. It's a pity, at open apertures the lens loses in sharpness to modern analogues, but photography is not rich in sharpness alone :). Non ed, i suspect they. Launched alongside the nikon d80 in august 2006, it perfectly comple In some tests it was complained about yellow/blue ca's but the lens i could test did not produce ca's. The entire body is made of plastic (including bayonet), which is why it turned out quite easy. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. Trusted reviews is supported by its audience. Zoom ring very broad and rubberized, labeled 70, 100, 135, 200 and 300 mm. Slow af, build quality, unusable in lowlights. A decent performer in iq. Don't fret over the ed vs. The lens does suffer at 300mm though, with frighteningly poor performance which, unfortunately, blows all its good work at 70mm out of the window. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. It's built better, it's bigger, photodo.com says it's much sharper, and it's real nikon. For a couple of years the community looked with envy towards canon where even two good quality, slow speed tele zooms are. This makes it possible to design the lens with a smaller minimum length ( generally when it is zoomed out) compared to internal zoom lenses. 6 out of 10 points and not recommended by dugong5pm (52 reviews) cheap. It seems that the lens works very good at 200mm and even better at the lower. Verdict performs best at the shorter end of the range, but deteriorates as you zoom
Slow af, build quality, unusable in lowlights.
At least not at 300/5,6 and the actual conditions. The lens does suffer at 300mm though, with frighteningly poor performance which, unfortunately, blows all its good work at 70mm out of the window. It seems that the lens works very good at 200mm and even better at the lower.
It seems that the lens works very good at 200mm and even better at the lower. If i moved the manual focus ring, the meter in the window only moved between closest up to 7,5ft, it was more or less the same when using af mounted on my d700 body. Slow af, build quality, unusable in lowlights. This makes it possible to design the lens with a smaller minimum length ( generally when it is zoomed out) compared to internal zoom lenses. I bought it used a couple of months ago, it seemed to be in very good condition. Zoom ring very broad and rubberized, labeled 70, 100, 135, 200 and 300 mm. Trusted reviews is supported by its audience. Verdict performs best at the shorter end of the range, but deteriorates as you zoom It's a pity, at open apertures the lens loses in sharpness to modern analogues, but photography is not rich in sharpness alone :). If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. For a couple of years the community looked with envy towards canon where even two good quality, slow speed tele zooms are. The lens does suffer at 300mm though, with frighteningly poor performance which, unfortunately, blows all its good work at 70mm out of the window. At least not at 300/5,6 and the actual conditions. Non ed, i suspect they. Launched alongside the nikon d80 in august 2006, it perfectly comple 6 out of 10 points and not recommended by dugong5pm (52 reviews) cheap. The entire body is made of plastic (including bayonet), which is why it turned out quite easy. In some tests it was complained about yellow/blue ca's but the lens i could test did not produce ca's. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. A decent performer in iq. Review by klaus schroiff, published march 2007 lens kindly provided by erik heyer!
Don't fret over the ed vs.
For a couple of years the community looked with envy towards canon where even two good quality, slow speed tele zooms are. 6 out of 10 points and not recommended by dugong5pm (52 reviews) cheap. A decent performer in iq.
It seems that the lens works very good at 200mm and even better at the lower. The lens does suffer at 300mm though, with frighteningly poor performance which, unfortunately, blows all its good work at 70mm out of the window. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. In some tests it was complained about yellow/blue ca's but the lens i could test did not produce ca's. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. Zoom ring very broad and rubberized, labeled 70, 100, 135, 200 and 300 mm. A decent performer in iq. Don't fret over the ed vs. Trusted reviews is supported by its audience. 6 out of 10 points and not recommended by dugong5pm (52 reviews) cheap. Verdict performs best at the shorter end of the range, but deteriorates as you zoom Non ed, i suspect they. Launched alongside the nikon d80 in august 2006, it perfectly comple Slow af, build quality, unusable in lowlights. I bought it used a couple of months ago, it seemed to be in very good condition. At least not at 300/5,6 and the actual conditions. For a couple of years the community looked with envy towards canon where even two good quality, slow speed tele zooms are. The entire body is made of plastic (including bayonet), which is why it turned out quite easy. It's built better, it's bigger, photodo.com says it's much sharper, and it's real nikon. It's a pity, at open apertures the lens loses in sharpness to modern analogues, but photography is not rich in sharpness alone :). Review by klaus schroiff, published march 2007 lens kindly provided by erik heyer!
In some tests it was complained about yellow/blue ca's but the lens i could test did not produce ca's.
It's a pity, at open apertures the lens loses in sharpness to modern analogues, but photography is not rich in sharpness alone :). Non ed, i suspect they. It's built better, it's bigger, photodo.com says it's much sharper, and it's real nikon.
6 out of 10 points and not recommended by dugong5pm (52 reviews) cheap. Verdict performs best at the shorter end of the range, but deteriorates as you zoom Trusted reviews is supported by its audience. Don't fret over the ed vs. It's built better, it's bigger, photodo.com says it's much sharper, and it's real nikon. Non ed, i suspect they. This makes it possible to design the lens with a smaller minimum length ( generally when it is zoomed out) compared to internal zoom lenses. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. The lens does suffer at 300mm though, with frighteningly poor performance which, unfortunately, blows all its good work at 70mm out of the window. For a couple of years the community looked with envy towards canon where even two good quality, slow speed tele zooms are. Zoom ring very broad and rubberized, labeled 70, 100, 135, 200 and 300 mm. The entire body is made of plastic (including bayonet), which is why it turned out quite easy. If i moved the manual focus ring, the meter in the window only moved between closest up to 7,5ft, it was more or less the same when using af mounted on my d700 body. A decent performer in iq. At least not at 300/5,6 and the actual conditions. Slow af, build quality, unusable in lowlights. It seems that the lens works very good at 200mm and even better at the lower. Review by klaus schroiff, published march 2007 lens kindly provided by erik heyer! Launched alongside the nikon d80 in august 2006, it perfectly comple In some tests it was complained about yellow/blue ca's but the lens i could test did not produce ca's. It's a pity, at open apertures the lens loses in sharpness to modern analogues, but photography is not rich in sharpness alone :).
If i moved the manual focus ring, the meter in the window only moved between closest up to 7,5ft, it was more or less the same when using af mounted on my d700 body.
Verdict performs best at the shorter end of the range, but deteriorates as you zoom Review by klaus schroiff, published march 2007 lens kindly provided by erik heyer! If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission.
Launched alongside the nikon d80 in august 2006, it perfectly comple If i moved the manual focus ring, the meter in the window only moved between closest up to 7,5ft, it was more or less the same when using af mounted on my d700 body. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. It's a pity, at open apertures the lens loses in sharpness to modern analogues, but photography is not rich in sharpness alone :). Non ed, i suspect they. Trusted reviews is supported by its audience. It's built better, it's bigger, photodo.com says it's much sharper, and it's real nikon. For a couple of years the community looked with envy towards canon where even two good quality, slow speed tele zooms are. The entire body is made of plastic (including bayonet), which is why it turned out quite easy. Review by klaus schroiff, published march 2007 lens kindly provided by erik heyer! Don't fret over the ed vs. A decent performer in iq. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. Verdict performs best at the shorter end of the range, but deteriorates as you zoom I bought it used a couple of months ago, it seemed to be in very good condition. This makes it possible to design the lens with a smaller minimum length ( generally when it is zoomed out) compared to internal zoom lenses. The lens does suffer at 300mm though, with frighteningly poor performance which, unfortunately, blows all its good work at 70mm out of the window. Zoom ring very broad and rubberized, labeled 70, 100, 135, 200 and 300 mm. Slow af, build quality, unusable in lowlights. In some tests it was complained about yellow/blue ca's but the lens i could test did not produce ca's. 6 out of 10 points and not recommended by dugong5pm (52 reviews) cheap.
Launched alongside the nikon d80 in august 2006, it perfectly comple
This makes it possible to design the lens with a smaller minimum length ( generally when it is zoomed out) compared to internal zoom lenses. Trusted reviews is supported by its audience.
Non ed, i suspect they. It's a pity, at open apertures the lens loses in sharpness to modern analogues, but photography is not rich in sharpness alone :). Trusted reviews is supported by its audience. Launched alongside the nikon d80 in august 2006, it perfectly comple If i moved the manual focus ring, the meter in the window only moved between closest up to 7,5ft, it was more or less the same when using af mounted on my d700 body. At least not at 300/5,6 and the actual conditions. For a couple of years the community looked with envy towards canon where even two good quality, slow speed tele zooms are. 6 out of 10 points and not recommended by dugong5pm (52 reviews) cheap. In some tests it was complained about yellow/blue ca's but the lens i could test did not produce ca's. This makes it possible to design the lens with a smaller minimum length ( generally when it is zoomed out) compared to internal zoom lenses. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Don't fret over the ed vs. Slow af, build quality, unusable in lowlights. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. Verdict performs best at the shorter end of the range, but deteriorates as you zoom It seems that the lens works very good at 200mm and even better at the lower. Zoom ring very broad and rubberized, labeled 70, 100, 135, 200 and 300 mm. A decent performer in iq. Review by klaus schroiff, published march 2007 lens kindly provided by erik heyer! I bought it used a couple of months ago, it seemed to be in very good condition. The lens does suffer at 300mm though, with frighteningly poor performance which, unfortunately, blows all its good work at 70mm out of the window.