6 1 2 Vs 7 1 4 Cordless Circular Saw Info
6 1 2 Vs 7 1 4 Cordless Circular Saw. The larger the blade size, the more power is needed to rotate it. A 6 1/2 blade generally renders a depth between 2 1/8 and 2 1/4”. For ripping timber thicker than just plywood you need to stick to a corded circular saw. The exception to this relationship is the ridgid, which, despite its 7 1/4 blade, performed more like a 6 1/2 saw. Offers a better cut depth and can cut 2×4 with ease compared to a 6 ½ inch blade; The 6.5 will cut up to 2 1/16”, while the 7 ¼” cuts up to 2 ⅜”. Personally i would do the brushless 6.5”. Because cordless circular saws have a limited supply of power, most cannot handle large blades. However, a 7 ¼ saw is better for moderate to advanced tasks, angular cuts and often comes with different blades. Generally speaking, the 7,1/4 are corded saws,+ the 6, 1/2 are cordless. It will do a 2x4 across the face, but the saw does struggle a bit even with pine. Circular saw combines performance and versatility and features a powerful brushless motor that delivers 4,950 rpm for fast, accurate, and consistent cutting. All circular saws can cut bevels to 45° left and right, but some can create even larger angles. However, both saws had small issues that i think this new saw overcomes. The best results come from the 7 1/4 models, the poorest from the mousy 5 1/2 black+decker.
With the smaller saw & lack of electrical cord i'm able to cut a straighter line than with my 7 1/4 saw. Though the difference is small, it may be important if you're cutting lots of dimensional lumber. I own a power miter saw for cutting 2x4's so i found that. Not to mention, the smaller option is also more affordable. Of course more capacity, typically means more weight. It's really meant for stock under 1 inch thick. Because cordless circular saws have a limited supply of power, most cannot handle large blades. Personally i would do the brushless 6.5”. 7 ¼ inch circular saws tend to have more power and can thus hand more demanding tasks; Circular saw combines performance and versatility and features a powerful brushless motor that delivers 4,950 rpm for fast, accurate, and consistent cutting. The larger the blade size, the more power is needed to rotate it. The best results come from the 7 1/4 models, the poorest from the mousy 5 1/2 black+decker. For ripping timber thicker than just plywood you need to stick to a corded circular saw. Therefore, it is easy to find a replacement blade or even a specialized blade e.g., for cutting metal Generally speaking, the 7,1/4 are corded saws,+ the 6, 1/2 are cordless.
The makita xsh10 has the biggest capacity of any cordless circular saw we’ve tested.
7 ¼ inch circular saws tend to have more power and can thus hand more demanding tasks; However, both saws had small issues that i think this new saw overcomes. Minor sure, but it’s when you tilt them into 45 degree angles, that the 7 ¼” can do something the 6.5 can’t.
Of course more capacity, typically means more weight. Use a corded circular saw for thicker timber. Lots of different blades are available. Not to mention, the smaller option is also more affordable. A 7 1/4 blade increases that to about 2 1/2. Minor sure, but it’s when you tilt them into 45 degree angles, that the 7 ¼” can do something the 6.5 can’t. Circular saw combines performance and versatility and features a powerful brushless motor that delivers 4,950 rpm for fast, accurate, and consistent cutting. Offers a better cut depth and can cut 2×4 with ease compared to a 6 ½ inch blade; Because cordless circular saws have a limited supply of power, most cannot handle large blades. The best results come from the 7 1/4 models, the poorest from the mousy 5 1/2 black+decker. We typically buy circ saw blades in packs of 25 which works out to $4 a blade. The exception to this relationship is the ridgid, which, despite its 7 1/4 blade, performed more like a 6 1/2 saw. The 6.5 will cut up to 2 1/16”, while the 7 ¼” cuts up to 2 ⅜”. Though the difference is small, it may be important if you're cutting lots of dimensional lumber. However i wont pay that much for blades, we buy in bulk from tool houses and wholesalers. The larger the blade size, the more power is needed to rotate it. I own a power miter saw for cutting 2x4's so i found that. However, a 7 ¼ saw is better for moderate to advanced tasks, angular cuts and often comes with different blades. The 36v is going to be heavier, the brushes will cost you in efficiency, and it looks like it’s discontinued to boot.being an older model who knows if it’s even that much stronger than the the newer brushless 6.5”. The 7 1/4 will rip through just about everything, including modest hardwoods. I bought a 20v version and it's great for cutting plywood.
Because cordless circular saws have a limited supply of power, most cannot handle large blades.
Circular saw combines performance and versatility and features a powerful brushless motor that delivers 4,950 rpm for fast, accurate, and consistent cutting. For ripping timber thicker than just plywood you need to stick to a corded circular saw. I own a power miter saw for cutting 2x4's so i found that.
Circular saw combines performance and versatility and features a powerful brushless motor that delivers 4,950 rpm for fast, accurate, and consistent cutting. Use a corded circular saw for thicker timber. The exception to this relationship is the ridgid, which, despite its 7 1/4 blade, performed more like a 6 1/2 saw. Corded saws are available in many sizes; The 36v is going to be heavier, the brushes will cost you in efficiency, and it looks like it’s discontinued to boot.being an older model who knows if it’s even that much stronger than the the newer brushless 6.5”. Not surprisingly, the cut test results group by blade size. The larger the blade size, the more power is needed to rotate it. I have the older 18v 6.5 trim saw as well as an xr 20v 7 1/4 saw. The 6 1/2 is great for sheet goods. However, a 7 ¼ saw is better for moderate to advanced tasks, angular cuts and often comes with different blades. Though the difference is small, it may be important if you're cutting lots of dimensional lumber. Corded circular saws don't depend on batteries for power and are better suited for tough cutting jobs like masonry, steel and continuous wood cutting. All circular saws can cut bevels to 45° left and right, but some can create even larger angles. The 7 1/4 will rip through just about everything, including modest hardwoods. Generally speaking, the 7,1/4 are corded saws,+ the 6, 1/2 are cordless. 7 ¼ inch circular saws tend to have more power and can thus hand more demanding tasks; I own a power miter saw for cutting 2x4's so i found that. Not to mention, the smaller option is also more affordable. Both saws made a huge impact and proved that cordless circular saws are ready for prime time especially in the power category. Because cordless circular saws have a limited supply of power, most cannot handle large blades. Therefore, it is easy to find a replacement blade or even a specialized blade e.g., for cutting metal
Not surprisingly, the cut test results group by blade size.
It will do a 2x4 across the face, but the saw does struggle a bit even with pine. Lots of different blades are available. Most blades on the market are 7 ¼ inches.
A 7 1/4 blade increases that to about 2 1/2. The makita xsh10 has the biggest capacity of any cordless circular saw we’ve tested. With the smaller saw & lack of electrical cord i'm able to cut a straighter line than with my 7 1/4 saw. Circular saw combines performance and versatility and features a powerful brushless motor that delivers 4,950 rpm for fast, accurate, and consistent cutting. The 36v is going to be heavier, the brushes will cost you in efficiency, and it looks like it’s discontinued to boot.being an older model who knows if it’s even that much stronger than the the newer brushless 6.5”. Though the difference is small, it may be important if you're cutting lots of dimensional lumber. But for most diy and building jobs, a small circular saw of the cordless variety can be quicker and easier to use. Offers a better cut depth and can cut 2×4 with ease compared to a 6 ½ inch blade; The 6.5 will cut up to 2 1/16”, while the 7 ¼” cuts up to 2 ⅜”. The 7 1/4 will rip through just about everything, including modest hardwoods. Best cordless circular saw comparison table: For ripping timber thicker than just plywood you need to stick to a corded circular saw. The best results come from the 7 1/4 models, the poorest from the mousy 5 1/2 black+decker. Corded saws are available in many sizes; Therefore, it is easy to find a replacement blade or even a specialized blade e.g., for cutting metal Personally i would do the brushless 6.5”. Not to mention, the smaller option is also more affordable. It's really meant for stock under 1 inch thick. Generally speaking, the 7,1/4 are corded saws,+ the 6, 1/2 are cordless. Of course more capacity, typically means more weight. It will do a 2x4 across the face, but the saw does struggle a bit even with pine.
The 36v is going to be heavier, the brushes will cost you in efficiency, and it looks like it’s discontinued to boot.being an older model who knows if it’s even that much stronger than the the newer brushless 6.5”.
Offers a better cut depth and can cut 2×4 with ease compared to a 6 ½ inch blade; The 6.5 will cut up to 2 1/16”, while the 7 ¼” cuts up to 2 ⅜”. I bought a 20v version and it's great for cutting plywood.
A 6 ½ saw is more lightweight and portable, making it much easier to maneuver and a more suitable choice for those who don’t often have advanced projects. Use a corded circular saw for thicker timber. However i wont pay that much for blades, we buy in bulk from tool houses and wholesalers. With the smaller saw & lack of electrical cord i'm able to cut a straighter line than with my 7 1/4 saw. Because cordless circular saws have a limited supply of power, most cannot handle large blades. Not to mention, the smaller option is also more affordable. I have the older 18v 6.5 trim saw as well as an xr 20v 7 1/4 saw. Minor sure, but it’s when you tilt them into 45 degree angles, that the 7 ¼” can do something the 6.5 can’t. 7 ¼ inch circular saws tend to have more power and can thus hand more demanding tasks; Therefore, it is easy to find a replacement blade or even a specialized blade e.g., for cutting metal The larger the blade size, the more power is needed to rotate it. The 6 1/2 is great for sheet goods. Most blades on the market are 7 ¼ inches. The best results come from the 7 1/4 models, the poorest from the mousy 5 1/2 black+decker. For ripping timber thicker than just plywood you need to stick to a corded circular saw. The exception to this relationship is the ridgid, which, despite its 7 1/4 blade, performed more like a 6 1/2 saw. The 7 1/4 will rip through just about everything, including modest hardwoods. It rates very good in its general performance and many of its pro features. A 7 1/4 blade increases that to about 2 1/2. Best cordless circular saw comparison table: However, a 7 ¼ saw is better for moderate to advanced tasks, angular cuts and often comes with different blades.
Personally i would do the brushless 6.5”.
The best results come from the 7 1/4 models, the poorest from the mousy 5 1/2 black+decker. Though the difference is small, it may be important if you're cutting lots of dimensional lumber. A 6 ½ saw is more lightweight and portable, making it much easier to maneuver and a more suitable choice for those who don’t often have advanced projects.
Of course more capacity, typically means more weight. Not surprisingly, the cut test results group by blade size. The larger the blade size, the more power is needed to rotate it. The best results come from the 7 1/4 models, the poorest from the mousy 5 1/2 black+decker. Use a corded circular saw for thicker timber. It will do a 2x4 across the face, but the saw does struggle a bit even with pine. A 7 1/4 blade increases that to about 2 1/2. The 7 1/4 will rip through just about everything, including modest hardwoods. Minor sure, but it’s when you tilt them into 45 degree angles, that the 7 ¼” can do something the 6.5 can’t. A 6 1/2 blade generally renders a depth between 2 1/8 and 2 1/4”. I bought a 20v version and it's great for cutting plywood. However i wont pay that much for blades, we buy in bulk from tool houses and wholesalers. All circular saws can cut bevels to 45° left and right, but some can create even larger angles. It's really meant for stock under 1 inch thick. I own a power miter saw for cutting 2x4's so i found that. Therefore, it is easy to find a replacement blade or even a specialized blade e.g., for cutting metal The makita xsh10 has the biggest capacity of any cordless circular saw we’ve tested. However, both saws had small issues that i think this new saw overcomes. Because cordless circular saws have a limited supply of power, most cannot handle large blades. I have the older 18v 6.5 trim saw as well as an xr 20v 7 1/4 saw. Though the difference is small, it may be important if you're cutting lots of dimensional lumber.
The 7 1/4 will rip through just about everything, including modest hardwoods.
The exception to this relationship is the ridgid, which, despite its 7 1/4 blade, performed more like a 6 1/2 saw. A 6 1/2 blade generally renders a depth between 2 1/8 and 2 1/4”. However, a 7 ¼ saw is better for moderate to advanced tasks, angular cuts and often comes with different blades.
It will do a 2x4 across the face, but the saw does struggle a bit even with pine. For ripping timber thicker than just plywood you need to stick to a corded circular saw. 7 ¼ inch circular saws tend to have more power and can thus hand more demanding tasks; But for most diy and building jobs, a small circular saw of the cordless variety can be quicker and easier to use. Generally speaking, the 7,1/4 are corded saws,+ the 6, 1/2 are cordless. Corded saws are available in many sizes; A 6 1/2 blade generally renders a depth between 2 1/8 and 2 1/4”. All circular saws can cut bevels to 45° left and right, but some can create even larger angles. Offers a better cut depth and can cut 2×4 with ease compared to a 6 ½ inch blade; The 6.5 will cut up to 2 1/16”, while the 7 ¼” cuts up to 2 ⅜”. Most blades on the market are 7 ¼ inches. Best cordless circular saw comparison table: Therefore, it is easy to find a replacement blade or even a specialized blade e.g., for cutting metal I own a power miter saw for cutting 2x4's so i found that. Lots of different blades are available. Though the difference is small, it may be important if you're cutting lots of dimensional lumber. It rates very good in its general performance and many of its pro features. The 36v is going to be heavier, the brushes will cost you in efficiency, and it looks like it’s discontinued to boot.being an older model who knows if it’s even that much stronger than the the newer brushless 6.5”. Of course more capacity, typically means more weight. A 7 1/4 blade increases that to about 2 1/2. Because cordless circular saws have a limited supply of power, most cannot handle large blades.
Best cordless circular saw comparison table:
A 7 1/4 blade increases that to about 2 1/2.
However, a 7 ¼ saw is better for moderate to advanced tasks, angular cuts and often comes with different blades. A 7 1/4 blade increases that to about 2 1/2. The 36v is going to be heavier, the brushes will cost you in efficiency, and it looks like it’s discontinued to boot.being an older model who knows if it’s even that much stronger than the the newer brushless 6.5”. However, both saws had small issues that i think this new saw overcomes. The 6.5 trim saw is exactly that, a trim saw. With the smaller saw & lack of electrical cord i'm able to cut a straighter line than with my 7 1/4 saw. A 6 ½ saw is more lightweight and portable, making it much easier to maneuver and a more suitable choice for those who don’t often have advanced projects. I have the older 18v 6.5 trim saw as well as an xr 20v 7 1/4 saw. The larger the blade size, the more power is needed to rotate it. Most blades on the market are 7 ¼ inches. Of course more capacity, typically means more weight. Because cordless circular saws have a limited supply of power, most cannot handle large blades. Offers a better cut depth and can cut 2×4 with ease compared to a 6 ½ inch blade; A 6 1/2 blade generally renders a depth between 2 1/8 and 2 1/4”. It's really meant for stock under 1 inch thick. All circular saws can cut bevels to 45° left and right, but some can create even larger angles. I own a power miter saw for cutting 2x4's so i found that. Generally speaking, the 7,1/4 are corded saws,+ the 6, 1/2 are cordless. Lots of different blades are available. Personally i would do the brushless 6.5”. Corded saws are available in many sizes;